A blog of infinite Choobism, and thence of incredible awesomeness.

Monday, November 20, 2006


Some people have suggested that in order for atheists and theists to get along there should be a measure of respect, and that meaningful debate should occur that is devoid of vulgarity and personal attacks. I say fuck that retarded bullshit. If someone says to me that they believe that the earth is under attack from shapeshifting lizard creatures that have infiltrated the highest levels of government and are hell bent on establishing a new world order and enslaving humanity I will tell them to shut the fuck up and finish bagging my groceries. I most certainly won’t respectfully agree to disagree or think deeply about what they have said and see if there is any common ground between what we both believe. If I did do any of these things you would, quite rightly, think I was a fucking imbecile. But instead of alien lizard shapeshifters we have cosmic Jewish zombies. We have proven hypocrites who recommend eating flesh and drinking blood, and tell you that you will burn in a fiery pit of hell for all eternity if you don’t do what they say. And I’m supposed to respect this point of view? Don’t make me fucking laugh.

The only thing this (and other similarly idiotic fairy tales) has got going for it is that there are a lot of assholes who believe it. That is it. No objective reasoning can possibly render these ideas palatable to someone who has not been brainfucked. No study of the available evidence can ever lead one even to have any doubts that this is not all demented man made fiction of the most fecal variety. Indeed, it takes a slow process of cuntification before one can accept these ideas at all. And I should respect this because there are a shit load of cunts? Not bloody likely.

And it gets worse. A central tenet of this malodorous dung residue (in all of its incarnations) is that if you are not on board you can expect the most unpleasant punishment imaginable. A poor choice of lunch can send you to hell if you forget to repent. Acting in a manner that is central to your existence, and that as a biological imperative is by definition caused by your creator, can send you to pitchfork alley in no time. What kind of cunt of a god would punish humans for eternity just for doing what he created them to need to do? This is the point of view I should respect? Dream on shitgoblins.

It is built into religions that atheists are the scum of the earth. Arabs and Christians and Jews will happily kill each other over who has the best god, but when confronted with the evil of atheist homosexuals they will set aside their differences. That is one of the most fucked up things I can think of. People who will kill children because of their religious views will work with people that hold those same views to prevent a couple of dudes from doing anal. If that isn’t retarded I don’t know what is. Respect? Contempt is too good for this kind of jism faced goat felcher. Why should I respect the blatantly absurd beliefs of someone who tells me that I am evil, that I will burn in hell and that only their point of view can save me? Fuck them all deep in their godholes.

Religious cunts are afforded far too much respect in general. They should be held to the same high standards as courts of law, scientists and journalists. If a journalist wrote a story about how great god is and cited a vision as his source would it get published? Sadly, it might, but it would be clear to all that it was utter wank. You don’t see particle physicists postulating a Christron that goes around making al the other particles behave. That would be asinine indeed. And why can’t a religious judge just pray to god to determine if someone is guilty or not? Because it would be fucking retarded, that’s why. And yet these Christ punching sleaze merchants can enjoy tax free status, can freely spout their mumbo jumbo and demand that those of us not afflicted with TCS (total cunt syndrome) treat them with respect! Well, I always treat theists with the respect they deserve. We may not always agree on how much respect that is (none), but I don’t care. Dialogue with theists is like foreplay with a rapist, and I don’t care for it at all. Fuck them; fuck them all.


Anonymous said...

When Satan makes you pay you will wish you did show respect you A-hole

Lily said...

What brought this on? You've been in a bad mood for the last week, it seems.

Choobus said...

JEsus H Krist, Lily reads the Chooblog??? It's a miracle!

Lily said...

Hardly, a miracle. But the forums have been incredibly boring, so I decided to check you out. Your blog is, how shall I say?, too masculine for my taste! But at least it wasn't boring!

Professor Chaos said...

Nicely done, Choobus. My favorite line:

"You don’t see particle physicists postulating a Christron that goes around making all the other particles behave."

Holopupenko said...

Ah, yes, the self-declared moral relativist moralizing again... how quaint...

Choobus said...

holocumchugger, please indicate exactly where I have declared myself to be a moral relativist.

Choobus said...

holoshitsucker, please also note how I don't moderate my comments, unlike virtually all christ punching sphincter lickers, yourself most certainly included. Maybe that's why your lame ass blog is such a lonely lonely place.

Anonymous said...


Choobus said...


Holopupenko said...

Okay, Choobs... I'll play your game: if you're not a moral relativist, upon what objective basis do you base your hatred of anyone who doesn't descend to your level? Oh, and by the way, when you can clean up your language and general hatred, you'll be more than welcome on many blogs... including my own. Apart from that, you have no objective moral claims on how I run my blog. Deal with it.

Choobus said...

it's not a game hollow one. You stated that I was a moral relativist. I want to know what you based this statement on. Are you a liar, or do you just assume things and act as though your assumptions were facts?

Holopupenko said...

     I believe it was a comment of yours to one of the Raving Atheist posts where you indicated something to the effect that morality was merely an outcome of evolution. (Which, by the way, is a fallacious argument if you believe book-burner Hume's "is to ought" criterion.) Sorry I can't find the exact reference date and comment right now (about 3-4 months ago? I was not involved, but was observing), but if you can show I'm wrong, I'll take the hit and apologize.
     What made your comment stand out in particular was, while you reduced morality to an evolutionary (read: material) mechanism for the survival of species, at the same time you imposed your own (im)morality upon others. Again, I'm open to being proved wrong by a misattribution to you. But may I suggest another way? Come clean and (1) share with us what your objective basis for morality is, and (2) demonstrate its validity by applying it against your usual M.O. of spewing foul language and hatred.
     By the way, while I'm at it, your post today is little more than a cover up for cowardice: you won't debate people faith because (a) you're ignorant of what people really believe, (b) a master of strawmen characterizations, (c) way outside the bounds of your self-centered, self-declared "awesomeness" when discussing anything that can't be captured by the modern empirical sciences.

Choobus said...

so now you determine my positions based on half remembered comments that I may or may not have made? That's pretty weak, even for a theist. And you ask me to prove that I did not make these comments? Eat shit assclown, that's the theist way of playing, and as I have said, I don't care fo rit. You accuse me of being too scared to confront theists because I am fond of strawmen? That is a strawman you delusional turd! I don't need to justify myself to you or anyone else. If you choose to read what I write then that's your business. apparantly you also choose not to understand what I have said. I see no value in debating theists, so I don't. It's pretty simple really, like you.

Holopupenko said...

I will go back and diligently wade through the comments to confirm my claim... but then again, to what end? As you've just stated, you don't care because irrespective of the outcome, no matter the truth, to discuss anything with a person of faith is a waste of time. Can you say, bigoted, closed-minded, self-centered,... and, more true than ever before, cowardly? Thanks, yet again, for confirming what is blatantly clear. You are so, so afraid I can almost see my monitor shaking...

Holopupenko said...

     By the way, Robert Heinlein once said, "The capacity of the human mind for swallowing nonsense and spewing it forth in violent and repressive action has never yet been plumbed." Let's see: (1) swallowing nonsense, and (2) [verbal] violence and repression. When did you meet Heinlein?

Anonymous said...

"If someone says to me that they believe that the earth is under attack from shapeshifting lizard creatures that have infiltrated the highest levels of government and are hell bent on establishing a new world order and enslaving humanity I will tell them to shut the fuck up and finish bagging my groceries."


Choobus said...

Here are some more quotes from Heinlein:

A long and wicked life followed by five minutes of perfect grace gets you into Heaven. An equally long life of decent living and good works followed by one outburst of taking the name of the Lord in vain - then have a heart attack at that moment and be damned for eternity. Is that the system?

I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.

It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.

Of all the strange "crimes" that human beings have legislated of nothing, "blasphemy" is the most amazing - with "obscenity" and "indecent exposure" fighting it out for the second and third place.

One man's theology is another man's belly laugh.

Sin lies only in hurting other people unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. (Hurting yourself is not sinful - just stupid).

Theology is never any help; it is searching in a dark cellar at midnight for a black cat that isn't there. Theologians can persuade themselves of anything.

Choobus said...

Tardo Chuggins said

"As you've just stated, you don't care because irrespective of the outcome, no matter the truth, to discuss anything with a person of faith is a waste of time. Can you say, bigoted, closed-minded, self-centered,... and, more true than ever before, cowardly?"

What a fucking clown. He comments on my post in which I explain why I don't waste my time talking to theists because I have no respect for them and consider it to be a huge waste of time, and then expects me to debate him about it! Good one numbnuts.

He's right though. I am scared. Terrified in fact. I am so scared I think I just shat myself. The idea that an anonymous internet buffoon might not agree with me is indeed terrifying.

Fuck you Choobus! said...


Choobus said...

dude, you should use tags. Your lame attempt to diss me out doesn't really work too well if I have to cut and paste the fucking url. What kind of amateur are you?

fuck you choobus! said...

Fuck you choobus! Jesus hates you!

Choobus said...

Jesus hates me? HE didn't say anything after sucking me off last night. What a two faced bastard.

smellyoldgit said...

My faith is truely restored.
Profanity and justifiable abuse abound. Theists pissed off - even Lily-cow dropping by and complaining. Rispek man !!

dani said...

Here are a number of SCIENTIFIC evidences which point towards a young universe.


1 - Solar Collapse - Evidence points to a more youthful sun
2 - Blue-white Stars - Their ubiquity disproves the Big Bang
3 - Amount of Hydrogen - There is too much hydrogen in relation to helium
4 - Galactic Arms - Their relative compactness reveals a youthful age
5 - Differential Disk Speeds - This is a another powerful evidence of youthful disk galaxies
6 - Galactic Magnetic Fields - This is an adjunct to the disk speed problem
7 - Variant-Velocity Galaxies - Stars within galaxies are moving at different speeds
8 - Thorium-Neodymium Ratio - A solar radioactive nuclide measurement confirms the youthful age of the stars
9 - Rings of Saturn - They are too delicately formed to have existed very long
10 - Brightness of Those Rings - This fact, plus the fact they have not fallen into the planet, also attests to a youthful age
11 - Meteoroid Impact Problem - Saturn's rings should have been destroyed within 10,000 years
12 - Other Planetary Ring Systems - The rings around Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune are even more delicate
13 - Venus' Surface Indicates Extreme Youth - The Magellan flyby discovered this fact
14 - Evidence that the Earth and Moon Are Quite Young - A remarkable amount of evidence points to a young age for our world and its satellite

Choobus said...

nice cut and paste job dani you pole smoking idiot. Do you even understand any of the trite wank you have posted? Probably not, because like all godidiots you are a fucking moron. Your faith is evidence that you're a stupid cunt of the highest order. Who should I believe, thousands and thousands of cosmologists and astrophysicists with Phd's and in some cases nobel prizes, or a manky little chode sucker who doesn't even know how to solve the problem of her own stinking poonani. Don't come here with your unsubstantiated science fiction unless you have the chops to back it up bitch.

Do you do anal, you fucking anal whore?

Choobus said...

PS, don't tell me about the rings around uranus you skank. I don't want to know.

dani said...

*Okay smarty-pants:

If the bones are 70 million years old - How could blood cells survive that long?

This discovery gives prevailing support to the implication that dinosaur fossils are NOT millions and millions of years old at all, but were most likely fossilized under catastrophic conditions a few thousand years ago during a global flood.

Anonymous said...

Man, I'm no astronomer, but even I can smell the bullshit in that young earth "evidence" list.

Choobus said...

Oh Jesus! That is pretty damn funny.

From the BBC:

"Ms McNamara, and colleagues in the UK, Spain and US, say the bone marrow was preserved because the bones acted as a protective shell, preventing microbes from invading and breaking the soft tissue down."

You ignorant cunt, you think that you and a bunch of bible thumpers know what happened better than the actual scientists who discovered this? Your cherry picking is pathetic, and your understandning of science is laughable.

Anonymous said...

Dani, do you really expect us to believe that 4000 thousand years ago an alcoholic took 10,000,000,000 species on a fairy boat cruise? Please, get an education, and read a book (uh no not that one, a REAL science book).

Choobus said...

and for your blood cells (again from the BBC)

Dr Schweitzer is not making any grand claims that these soft traces are the degraded remnants of the original material - only that they give that appearance.

She and other scientists will want to establish if some hitherto unexplained fine-scale process has been at work in MOR 1125, which was pulled from the famous dinosaur rocks of eastern Montana known as the Hell Creek Formation.

Protein route

"This may not be fossilisation as we know it, of large macrostructures, but fossilisation at a molecular level," commented Dr Matthew Collins, who studies ancient bio-molecules at York University, UK.

"My suspicion is this process has led to the reaction of more resistant molecules with the normal proteins and carbohydrates which make up these cellular structures, and replaced them, so that we have a very tough, resistant, very lipid-rich material - a polymer that would be very difficult to break down and characterise, but which has preserved the structure," he told the BBC.

Stupidity and ignorance are henious enough but willful stupidity and ignorance in the furtherance of a desperate desire to find inner peace is simply vile. You and all your Christ loving assclon friends are a disgrace to the human race, and in the future you will be considered as no better than ancient sun worshippers who used human sacrifices to appease the gods.

You Christians are Sad mother fuckers one and all. It'sd lucky for you the muslims are just as retarded or you would stand out as the most absurd dumbass chode monkeys on the fucking planet.

Anonymous said...

This is what Dani writes in her profile on her blog:

"I am a wife and a homeschooling mother of three beautiful girls. I am on assignment from God to be a good helper to my husband and to train up my children with the Fear and Admonition of the Lord!"

Jesus H Christ! Damn I feel really sorry for those girls. Do you really think you have the right to shove your distructive religous beliefs down their throats? What kind of a sick, dishonorable fuck are you?

Choobus said...

"I am on assignment from God to be a good helper to my husband"

you know what that means:

she takes it up the arse

thjen she does arse to mouth

then she she swallows

Maybe I should get a christian stepford wife! What a dirty cow. I bet she's a right munter as well.

Anonymous said...

Holy christ-on-a-stick the last 15 mins of my life have been spent cracking up - its hilarious. Dani shouldnt be comin back but if she does - she has some balls and good luck to her!

Anyway any christians who you insult should really love you anyway. Its a win/win situation so insult away.

I think the greastest bullshit which will ever touch the face of this planet is the ideas of creationism. At least one can be ignorant and belive a bible, i mean thats just reatarded.

But to try and use science to PROOVE that the earth is 6000 years old or whatever is such bullshit I want to puke up and die. Seriously hundreds of scientists have proposed radical ideas and those ideas have been accepted into mainstream science.

Why have no creationist theories been even midly accepted by mainstream science? 1) its bullshit 2) because its just psuedo science, it wont stand up to the grilly scrutiny which is required to be accepted. It is just shoved out there with an (often hard-to-understand) explaination.

I want to start a forum of creationism vs reality. Is there one already? Mail me: Titanium_monkfish@hotmail.com

VladTheImpaler said...

Choobus, aren’t you a moral relativist? I'm just wondering if there are any logical alternatives to Moral relativism, the question is based on your argument with the Christ-tard earlier in the comments.